Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Injectable, spontaneously assembling, inorganic scaffolds modulate immune cells in vivo and increase vaccine efficacy

Abstract

Implanting materials in the body to program host immune cells is a promising alternative to transplantation of cells manipulated ex vivo to direct an immune response, but doing so requires a surgical procedure. Here we demonstrate that high-aspect-ratio, mesoporous silica rods (MSRs) injected with a needle spontaneously assemble in vivo to form macroporous structures that provide a 3D cellular microenvironment for host immune cells. In mice, substantial numbers of dendritic cells are recruited to the pores between the scaffold rods. The recruitment of dendritic cells and their subsequent homing to lymph nodes can be modulated by sustained release of inflammatory signals and adjuvants from the scaffold. Moreover, injection of an MSR-based vaccine formulation enhances systemic helper T cells TH1 and TH2 serum antibody and cytotoxic T-cell levels compared to bolus controls. These findings suggest that injectable MSRs may serve as a multifunctional vaccine platform to modulate host immune cell function and provoke adaptive immune responses.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: A schematic representation of in vivo spontaneous assembly of MSRs and recruitment of host cells for maturation.
Figure 2: Subcutaneous injection of blank MSRs results in their spontaneous assembly in vivo, and substantial numbers of cells are recruited into interparticle pores of assembled MSRs.
Figure 3: Cytokine, PAMP and model antigen are released from MSR scaffold in sustained manner in vitro and in vivo.
Figure 4: Vaccine formulation consisting of MSRs loaded with GM-CSF, CpG and OVA is able to recruit dendritic cells, program them with antigen and PAMP, and enhance their trafficking to the dLN to exert systemic effects.
Figure 5: MSR vaccine generates potent humoral and cellular immune responses against a model antigen, OVA.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jähnisch, H. et al. Dendritic cell-based immunotherapy for prostate cancer. Clin. Dev. Immunol. 2010, 517493 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Porter, D.L., Levine, B.L., Kalos, M., Bagg, A. & June, C.H. Chimeric antigen receptor–modified T cells in chronic lymphoid leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 365, 725–733 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ali, O.A., Huebsch, N., Cao, L., Dranoff, G. & Mooney, D.J. Infection-mimicking materials to program dendritic cells in situ. Nat. Mater. 8, 151–158 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ali, O.A., Emerich, D., Dranoff, G. & Mooney, D.J. In situ regulation of DC subsets and T cells mediates tumor regression in mice. Sci. Transl. Med. 1, ra19 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Stephan, M.T., Moon, J.J., Um, S.H., Bershteyn, A. & Irvine, D.J. Therapeutic cell engineering with surface-conjugated synthetic nanoparticles. Nat. Med. 16, 1035–1041 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Moon, J.J. et al. Interbilayer-crosslinked multilamellar vesicles as synthetic vaccines for potent humoral and cellular immune responses. Nat. Mater. 10, 243–251 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. St. John, A.L., Chan, C.Y., Staats, H.F., Leong, K.W. & Abraham, S.N. Synthetic mast-cell granules as adjuvants to promote and polarize immunity in lymph nodes. Nat. Mater. 11, 250–257 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Park, J. et al. Combination delivery of TGF-β inhibitor and IL-2 by nanoscale liposomal polymeric gels enhances tumour immunotherapy. Nat. Mater. 11, 895–905 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Engelmayr, G.C. et al. Accordion-like honeycombs for tissue engineering of cardiac anisotropy. Nat. Mater. 7, 1003–1010 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Freed, L.E. et al. Biodegradable polymer scaffolds for tissue engineering. Biotechnol. (N.Y.) 12, 689–693 (1994).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Place, E.S., George, J.H., Williams, C.K. & Stevens, M.M. Synthetic polymer scaffolds for tissue engineering. Chem. Soc. Rev. 38, 1139–1151 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lutolf, M. & Hubbell, J. Synthetic biomaterials as instructive extracellular microenvironments for morphogenesis in tissue engineering. Nat. Biotechnol. 23, 47–55 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Yamada, Y. et al. Autogenous injectable bone for regeneration with mesenchymal stem cells and platelet-rich plasma: tissue-engineered bone regeneration. Tissue Eng. 10, 955–964 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Yuen, W.W., Du, N.R., Chan, C.H., Silva, E.A. & Mooney, D.J. Mimicking nature by codelivery of stimulant and inhibitor to create temporally stable and spatially restricted angiogenic zones. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 17933–17938 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Xia, T. et al. Polyethyleneimine coating enhances the cellular uptake of mesoporous silica nanoparticles and allows safe delivery of siRNA and DNA constructs. ACS Nano 3, 3273–3286 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim, J. et al. Multifunctional uniform nanoparticles composed of a magnetite nanocrystal core and a mesoporous silica shell for magnetic resonance and fluorescence imaging and for drug delivery. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 47, 8438–8441 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Li, Z., Barnes, J.C., Bosoy, A., Stoddart, J.F. & Zink, J.I. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles in biomedical applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 41, 2590–2605 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Garcia-Bennett, A.E. Synthesis, toxicology and potential of ordered mesoporous materials in nanomedicine. Nanomedicine 6, 867–877 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Petushkov, A., Ndiege, N., Salem, A.K. & Larsen, S.C. Toxicity of silica nanomaterials: Zeolites, mesoporous silica, and amorphous silica nanoparticles. Adv. Mol. Toxicol. 4, 223–266 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhao, D., Huo, Q., Feng, J., Chmelka, B.F. & Stucky, G.D. Nonionic triblock and star diblock copolymer and oligomeric surfactant syntheses of highly ordered, hydrothermally stable, mesoporous silica structures. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120, 6024–6036 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Schmidt-Winkel, P., Yang, P., Margolese, D.I., Chmelka, B.F. & Stucky, G.D. Fluoride-induced hierarchical ordering of mesoporous silica in aqueous acid-syntheses. Adv. Mater. 11, 303–307 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hudson, S.P., Padera, R.F., Langer, R. & Kohane, D.S. The biocompatibility of mesoporous silicates. Biomaterials 29, 4045–4055 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. He, Q., Shi, J., Zhu, M., Chen, Y. & Chen, F. The three-stage in vitro degradation behavior of mesoporous silica in simulated body fluid. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 131, 314–320 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Cauda, V., Schlossbauer, A. & Bein, T. Bio-degradation study of colloidal mesoporous silica nanoparticles: effect of surface functionalization with organo-silanes and poly (ethylene glycol). Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 132, 60–71 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Dieu, M. et al. Selective recruitment of immature and mature dendritic cells by distinct chemokines expressed in different anatomic sites. J. Exp. Med. 188, 373–386 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Randolph, G.J., Ochando, J. & Partida-Sánchez, S. Migration of dendritic cell subsets and their precursors. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 26, 293–316 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Steinman, R.M. The dendritic cell system and its role in immunogenicity. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 9, 271–296 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Banchereau, J. & Steinman, R.M. Dendritic cells and the control of immunity. Nature 392, 245–252 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Medzhitov, R. & Janeway, C.A. Jr. Innate immunity: impact on the adaptive immune response. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 9, 4–9 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Klinman, D.M. Immunotherapeutic uses of CpG oligodeoxynucleotides. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 4, 249–259 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Victora, G.D. & Nussenzweig, M.C. Germinal centers. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 30, 429–457 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Crotty, S. Follicular helper CD4 T cells (Tfh). Annu. Rev. Immunol. 29, 621–663 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhang, S. Fabrication of novel biomaterials through molecular self-assembly. Nat. Biotechnol. 21, 1171–1178 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Russell, B., Desai, T.A. & Goldspink, P. Temporal release of growth factors from 3d micro rod scaffolds for tissue regeneration. EP 2170419 A1 (2010).

  35. Dostert, C. et al. Innate immune activation through Nalp3 inflammasome sensing of asbestos and silica. Science 320, 674–677 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Sharp, F.A. et al. Uptake of particulate vaccine adjuvants by dendritic cells activates the NALP3 inflammasome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 870–875 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Hornung, V. et al. Silica crystals and aluminum salts activate the NALP3 inflammasome through phagosomal destabilization. Nat. Immunol. 9, 847–856 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Zhang, H. et al. Processing pathway dependence of amorphous silica nanoparticle toxicity: colloidal vs pyrolytic. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 15790–15804 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Reddy, S.T. et al. Exploiting lymphatic transport and complement activation in nanoparticle vaccines. Nat. Biotechnol. 25, 1159–1164 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Meng, H. et al. Autonomous in vitro anticancer drug release from mesoporous silica nanoparticles by pH-sensitive nanovalves. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 12690–12697 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Yang, P., Shili, G. & Jun, L. Functionalized mesoporous silica materials for controlled drug delivery. Chem. Soc. Rev. 41, 3679–3698 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Zou, W. Immunosuppressive networks in the tumour environment and their therapeutic relevance. Nat. Rev. Cancer 5, 263–274 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Rabinovich, G.A., Gabrilovich, D. & Sotomayor, E.M. Immunosuppressive strategies that are mediated by tumor cells. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 25, 267–296 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Moon, J.J. et al. Enhancing humoral responses to a malaria antigen with nanoparticle vaccines that expand Tfh cells and promote germinal center induction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 1080–1085 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Zhang, X.Q. et al. Potent antigen-specific immune responses stimulated by codelivery of CpG ODN and antigens in degradable microparticles. J. Immunother. 30, 469–478 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Uto, T. et al. The induction of innate and adaptive immunity by biodegradable poly (γ-glutamic acid) nanoparticles via a TLR4 and MyD88 signaling pathway. Biomaterials 32, 5206–5212 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Hutchison, S. et al. Antigen depot is not required for alum adjuvanticity. FASEB J. 26, 1272–1279 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Lu, A., Schmidt, W., Spliethoff, B. & Schüth, F. Synthesis and characterization of nanocast silica NCS-1 with CMK-3 as a template. Chemistry 10, 6085–6092 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Faulkner, L., Buchan, G. & Baird, M. Interleukin-10 does not affect phagocytosis of particulate antigen by bonemarrow-derived dendritic cells but does impair antigen presentation. Immunology 99, 523–531 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Bhattacharya, P., Gopisetty, A., Ganesh, B.B., Sheng, J.R. & Prabhakar, B.S. GM-CSF-induced, bone-marrow-derived dendritic cells can expand natural Tregs and induce adaptive Tregs by different mechanisms. J. Leukoc. Biol. 89, 235–249 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) (1R01EB015498), the National Science Foundation (NSF) Graduate Research Fellowship Program (GRFP), the Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering at Harvard University, and National Research Foundation (NRF) grants (2012R1A1A1042735, 2010-0027955) funded by the National Research Foundation under the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning, Korea. We also thank Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center (DF/HCC) Research Pathology Core and R. Bronson for the examination of the histology slides and J. Weaver from the Wyss Institute of Biologically Inspired Engineering for his help with scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Lastly, we thank R. Betensky from the Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health and the Harvard Catalyst for her help with statistical analysis; Harvard Catalyst is supported, in part, by the NIH (UL1 TR001102).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

J.K., W.A.L. and D.J.M. conceived and designed the experiments. J.K., W.A.L., Y.C., S.A.L. and C.S.V. performed the experiments. J.K., W.A.L., G.D. and D.J.M. analyzed the data. J.K., W.A.L. and D.J.M. wrote the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript. J.K. and W.A.L. contributed equally to this work. The principal investigator is D.J.M.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David J Mooney.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Text and Figures

Supplementary Figures 1–14 (PDF 1774 kb)

Supplementary Video 1

Z-stack of confocal images of sectioned nodule retrieved at day 7 post-injection. The injected MSRs were labeled with AF488 and load with GM-CSF (1 μg). The cross-section was stained with DAPI and phalloidin. (MOV 7043 kb)

Supplementary Video 2

Z-stack of confocal images of sectioned nodule retrieved at day 28 post-injection. The injected MSRs were labeled with AF488 and load with GM-CSF (1 μg). The cross-section was stained with DAPI and phalloidin. (MOV 2628 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, J., Li, W., Choi, Y. et al. Injectable, spontaneously assembling, inorganic scaffolds modulate immune cells in vivo and increase vaccine efficacy. Nat Biotechnol 33, 64–72 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3071

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3071

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing